Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 80
Filtrar
1.
Int J Surg ; 109(4): 737-751, 2023 Apr 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36917127

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Bundled interventions usually reduce surgical site infection (SSI) when implemented at single hospitals, but the feasibility of their implementation at the nationwide level and their clinical results are not well established. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Pragmatic interventional study to analyze the implementation and outcomes of a colorectal surgery care bundle within a nationwide quality improvement program. The bundle consisted of antibiotic prophylaxis, oral antibiotic prophylaxis (OAP), mechanical bowel preparation, laparoscopy, normothermia, and a wound retractor. Control group (CG) and Intervention group (IG) were compared. Overall SSI, superficial (S-SSI), deep (D-SSI), and organ/space (O/S-SSI) rates were analyzed. Secondary endpoints included microbiology, 30-day mortality, and length of hospital stay. RESULTS: A total of 37 849 procedures were included, 19 655 in the CG and 18 194 in the IG. In all, 5462 SSIs (14.43%) were detected: 1767 S-SSI (4.67%), 847 D-SSI (2.24%), and 2838 O/S-SSI (7.5%). Overall SSI fell from 18.38% (CG) to 10.17% (IG), odds ratio (OR) of 0.503 [0.473-0.524]. O/S-SSI rates were 9.15% (CG) and 5.72% (IG), OR of 0.602 [0.556-0.652]. The overall SSI rate was 16.71% when no measure was applied and 6.23% when all six were used. Bundle implementation reduced the probability of overall SSI (OR: 0.331; CI 95 : 0.242-0.453), and also O/S-SSI rate (OR: 0.643; CI 95 : 0.416-0.919). In the univariate analysis, all measures except normothermia were associated with a reduction in overall SSI, while only laparoscopy, OAP, and mechanical bowel preparation were related to a decrease in O/S-SSI. Laparoscopy, wound retractor, and OAP decreased overall SSI and O/S-SSI in the multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort study, the application of a specific care bundle within a nationwide nosocomial infection surveillance system proved feasible and resulted in a significant reduction in overall and O/S-SSI rates in the elective colon and rectal surgery. The OR for SSI fell between 1.5 and 3 times after the implementation of the bundle.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica , Humanos , Estudios de Cohortes , Estudios Prospectivos , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/epidemiología , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/prevención & control , Neoplasias Colorrectales/cirugía
2.
Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther ; 19(2): 245-251, 2021 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32825806

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Hospital antibiotic consumption is measured using defined-daily-doses (DDD) divided by bed days. However,other denominators as discharges could provide a more accurate interpretation of consumption. The main objective was to analyze trends of antibiotic consumption among hospitals in Catalonia during the period 2008-2016, using both DDD/100 bed days and DDD/100 discharges. METHODS: Retrospective, descriptive, and longitudinal study performed among acute care hospitals affiliated to VINCat Program. Antibiotic consumption was expressed using the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical/DDD classification and trends with a mixed linear model. Trends after using both DDD/100 bed days and DDD/100 discharges were determined and compared. RESULTS: Overall antibiotic consumption from 2008 to 2016 increased by 10.24% (P < 0.001) DDD/100 bed days, but remained stable (-0.87%, P = 0.051) in DDD/100 discharges. Although DDD and discharges remained unchanged, a significant reduction in bed days (-9.63%) and length of stay (-8.19%) was observed. A worrisome increase in the consumption of carbapenems and anti-MRSA drugs was noticed. CONCLUSION: Whereas a significant upward trend in antibiotic consumption in DDD/100 bed days was noticed, DDD/100 discharges remained stable. The description of both indicators seems therefore essential for a correct interpretation of data.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Utilización de Medicamentos/tendencias , Hospitales/estadística & datos numéricos , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Humanos , Estudios Longitudinales , Estudios Retrospectivos , España
3.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis ; 38(9): 1671-1676, 2019 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31140070

RESUMEN

The role of pre-hospital antibiotic therapy in invasive meningococcal diseases remains unclear with contradictory data. The aim was to determine this role in the outcome of invasive meningococcal disease. Observational cohort study of patients with/without pre-hospital antibiotic therapy in invasive meningococcal disease attended at the Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge (Barcelona) during the period 1977-2013. Univariate and multivariate analyses of mortality, corrected by propensity score used as a covariate to adjust for potential confounding, were performed. Patients with pre-hospital antibiotic therapy were also analyzed according to whether they had received oral (group A) or parenteral antibiotics (early therapy) (group B). Five hundred twenty-seven cases of invasive meningococcal disease were recorded and 125 (24%) of them received pre-hospital antibiotic therapy. Shock and age were the risk factors independently related to mortality. Mortality differed between patients with/without pre-hospital antibiotic therapy (0.8% vs. 8%, p = 0.003). Pre-hospital antibiotic therapy seemed to be a protective factor in the multivariate analysis of mortality (p = 0.038; OR, 0.188; 95% CI, 0.013-0.882). However, it was no longer protective when the propensity score was included in the analysis (p = 0.103; OR, 0.173; 95% CI, 0.021-1.423). Analysis of the oral and parenteral pre-hospital antibiotic groups revealed that there were no deaths in early therapy group. Patients able to receive oral antibiotics had less severe symptoms than those who did not receive pre-hospital antibiotics. Age and shock were the factors independently related to mortality. Early parenteral therapy was not associated with death. Oral antibiotic therapy in patients able to take it was associated with a beneficial effect in the prognosis of invasive meningococcal disease.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Infecciones Meningocócicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Meningocócicas/mortalidad , Admisión del Paciente , Adolescente , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Niño , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Hospitales , Humanos , Masculino , Infecciones Meningocócicas/complicaciones , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Pronóstico , Puntaje de Propensión , Factores de Riesgo , Choque , Adulto Joven
4.
Open Forum Infect Dis ; 6(3): ofz059, 2019 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30949522

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Invasive meningococcal disease (IMD), sepsis and/or meningitis continues to be a public health problem, with mortality rates ranging from 5% to 16%. The aim of our study was to further knowledge about IMD with a large series of cases occurring over a long period of time, in a cohort with a high percentage of adult patients. METHODS: Observational cohort study of patients with IMD between 1977 hand 2013 at our hospital, comparing patients with only sepsis and those with meningitis and several degrees of sepsis. The impact of dexamethasone and prophylactic phenytoin was determined, and an analysis of cutaneous and neurological sequelae was performed. RESULTS: A total of 527 episodes of IMD were recorded, comprising 57 cases of sepsis (11%) and 470 of meningitis with or without sepsis (89%). The number of episodes of IMD decreased from 352 of 527 (67%) in the first to 20 of 527 (4%) in the last quarter (P < .001). Thirty-three patients died (6%): 8 with sepsis (14%) and 25 with meningitis (5%) (P = .02). Cutaneous and neurological sequelae were present in 3% and 5% of survivors of sepsis and meningitis, respectively. The use of dexamethasone was safe and resulted in less arthritis, and patients given prophylactic phenytoin avoided seizures. CONCLUSIONS: The frequency of IMD has decreased sharply since 1977. Patients with sepsis only have the highest mortality and complication rates, dexamethasone use is safe and can prevent some arthritis episodes, and prophylactic phenytoin might be useful in a selected population. A rapid response and antibiotic therapy may help improve the prognosis.

5.
Enferm. infecc. microbiol. clín. (Ed. impr.) ; 37(1): 36-40, ene. 2019. tab, graf
Artículo en Inglés | IBECS | ID: ibc-176999

RESUMEN

Introduction: The overall increase in the use of carbapenems could lead to the selection of carbapenem-resistant bacteria. The objectives of this study were to analyze carbapenem use from 2008 to 2015 and their prescription profile in 58 hospitals affiliated to the VINCat Programme (nosocomial infection vigilance system). Methods: Retrospective, longitudinal and descriptive study of carbapenem use. Consecutive case-series study, looking for carbapenem prescription characteristics, conducted in January 2016. Use was calculated in defined daily doses (DDD)/100 patient-days (PD); prescription profiles were assessed using a standardized survey. Results: Carbapenem use increased 88.43%, from 3.37 DDD/100-PD to 6.35 DDD/100-PD (p < 0.001). A total of 631 patients were included in the prescription analysis. Carbapenems were prescribed empirically in 76.2% of patients, mainly for urinary tract and intra-abdominal infections due to suspicion of polymicrobial mixed infection (27.4%) and severity (25.4%). Conclusion: A worrying increase in carbapenem use was found in Catalonia. Stewardship interventions are required to prevent carbapenem overuse


Introducción: El aumento global del consumo de carbapenemas podría seleccionar bacterias resistentes a los carbapenemas. Los objetivos del estudio fueron analizar el consumo de carbapenemas entre 2008-2015 y su perfil de prescripción en 58 hospitales afiliados al Programa VINCat. Métodos: Estudio retrospectivo, longitudinal y descriptivo de consumo de carbapenemas. Estudio de series de casos consecutivos buscando características de la prescripción realizado en enero de 2016. Consumo calculado en dosis diarias definidas (DDD)/100 pacientes/días (PD); perfil de prescripción evaluado mediante una encuesta estandarizada. Resultados: El consumo de carbapenemas aumentó un 88,43%, de 3,37 DDD/100 PD a 6,35 DDD/100 PD (p < 0,001). Se incluyeron 631 pacientes en el análisis de prescripción. Un 76,2% recibió carbapenemas empíricamente para infecciones del tracto urinario e intra-abdominales por sospecha de infección mixta polimicrobiana (27,4%) y gravedad (25,4%). Conclusión: Se produjo un preocupante aumento del consumo de carbapenemas en Cataluña, por lo que son necesarias intervenciones específicas para evitar su uso excesivo


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Prescripciones de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Carbapenémicos/administración & dosificación , Hospitales/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estudios Longitudinales , España
6.
Artículo en Inglés, Español | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29703463

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The overall increase in the use of carbapenems could lead to the selection of carbapenem-resistant bacteria. The objectives of this study were to analyze carbapenem use from 2008 to 2015 and their prescription profile in 58 hospitals affiliated to the VINCat Programme (nosocomial infection vigilance system). METHODS: Retrospective, longitudinal and descriptive study of carbapenem use. Consecutive case-series study, looking for carbapenem prescription characteristics, conducted in January 2016. Use was calculated in defined daily doses (DDD)/100 patient-days (PD); prescription profiles were assessed using a standardized survey. RESULTS: Carbapenem use increased 88.43%, from 3.37 DDD/100-PD to 6.35 DDD/100-PD (p<0.001). A total of 631 patients were included in the prescription analysis. Carbapenems were prescribed empirically in 76.2% of patients, mainly for urinary tract and intra-abdominal infections due to suspicion of polymicrobial mixed infection (27.4%) and severity (25.4%). CONCLUSION: A worrying increase in carbapenem use was found in Catalonia. Stewardship interventions are required to prevent carbapenem overuse.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones Bacterianas/tratamiento farmacológico , Carbapenémicos/uso terapéutico , Cuidados Críticos , Utilización de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitales , Humanos , Estudios Longitudinales , Estudios Retrospectivos , España
7.
Enferm. infecc. microbiol. clín. (Ed. impr.) ; 35(8): 505-510, oct. 2017. graf, tab
Artículo en Español | IBECS | ID: ibc-167838

RESUMEN

Introducción: Los centros sanitarios de cuidados prolongados (CSCP) se han convertido en receptores de enfermos con un alto riesgo de aparición de infecciones relacionadas con la asistencia sanitaria (IRAS). Objetivo: Determinar la prevalencia de las IRAS en los CSCP de nuestro medio. Método: Durante el periodo 2011-2014 se realizaron 2 estudios anuales de prevalencia siguiendo las definiciones y metodología del estudio Healthcare-associated infections in long-term-care facilities (HALT). Resultados: La muestra final fue de 28.360 pacientes. La prevalencia de IRAS en los datos agregados fue de 10,2%. Las unidades de subagudos, con un 22,3%, y paliativos, con un 18,7%, fueron las que presentaron un mayor porcentaje de infecciones. Las infecciones más frecuentes fueron las respiratorias (35,8%) y las urinarias (35,8%). Conclusión: La prevalencia de infección en nuestros CSCP fue muy superior a la publicada en el estudio HALT. Nuestros resultados muestran la necesidad de desarrollar programas preventivos específicos en estos centros, garantizando un número suficiente de personal especializado en el control de las infecciones (AU)


Introduction: Long-term care facilities (LTCFs) have become receptors of patients with a high risk of healthcare-associated infections (HAIs). Objective: To determine the prevalence of HAIs in LTCFs. Method: During the period 2011-2014 2 annual prevalence studies were performed according to Healthcare-associated infections in long-term-care facilities (HALT) study definitions and methodology. Results: A total of 28,360 patients were included in the study. The overall prevalence rate of HAIs was 10.2%. Subacute units and palliative care units showed the highest rates, 22.3% and 18.7%, respectively. Main infections were respiratory tract infection (35.8%) and urinary tract infection (35.8%). Conclusion: These results were higher than other similar experiences, a fact that suggests the need to extend the specific strategies and programs to LTCFs, and ensuring a sufficient number of specialised staff in infection control (AU)


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Femenino , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Infección Hospitalaria/epidemiología , Atención a la Salud/organización & administración , Instituciones de Salud , Control de Infecciones/métodos , Factores de Riesgo , Atención a la Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , 28599 , Resistencia a Múltiples Medicamentos , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Seguridad del Paciente
8.
J Infect ; 75(5): 420-425, 2017 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28847701

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Invasive meningococcal disease is a severe infection. The appropriate duration of antibiotic therapy is not well established. METHODS: Two hundred and sixty-three consecutive patients with invasive meningococcal disease treated with 4 days' antibiotic therapy were compared with 264 consecutive patients treated previously at the same center with 7 days' antibiotic therapy. A Desirability of Outcome Ranking (DOOR) and Response Adjusted for Duration of Antibiotic Risk (RADAR) study was also performed. RESULTS: No relapses were recorded in any patient. Patients on the 4-day course were 63% female, with a median age of 23 years old (IQR 16-54) and patients on the 7-day course were 61% female, with a median age of 17 years old (IQR 12-43). Case fatality rate was 7% in the 4-d patients and 6% in the 7-d patients (p = 0.582). Neurological sequelae were recorded in 6% of the 4-d group and in 7% of the 7-d group ((p = 0.509) and cutaneous sequelae in 3% in both groups. There were no statistical significant differences between the groups in terms of clinical characteristics, laboratory findings or complications. The probability that a patient had a randomly chosen DOOR better with the 4-day regimen than with the 7-day regimen was 80.4% [95% CI 80.1-80.7%]. CONCLUSION: Invasive meningococcal disease may be successfully treated with a four-day course of antibiotic therapy without relapses.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Infecciones Meningocócicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Niño , Esquema de Medicación , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
9.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28439408

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Organ-space surgical site infections (SSI) are the most serious and costly infections after colorectal surgery. Most previous studies of risk factors for SSI have analysed colon and rectal procedures together. The aim of the study was to determine whether colon and rectal procedures have different risk factors and outcomes for organ-space SSI. METHODS: A multicentre observational prospective cohort study of adults undergoing elective colon and rectal procedures at 10 Spanish hospitals from 2011 to 2014. Patients were followed up until 30 days post-surgery. Surgical site infection was defined according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention criteria. Oral antibiotic prophylaxis (OAP) was considered as the administration of oral antibiotics the day before surgery combined with systemic intravenous antibiotic prophylaxis. RESULTS: Of 3,701 patients, 2,518 (68%) underwent colon surgery and 1,183 (32%) rectal surgery. In colon surgery, the overall SSI rate was 16.4% and the organ-space SSI rate was 7.9%, while in rectal surgery the rates were 21.6% and 11.5% respectively (p < 0.001). Independent risk factors for organ-space SSI in colon surgery were male sex (Odds ratio -OR-: 1.57, 95% CI: 1.14-2.15) and ostomy creation (OR: 2.65, 95% CI: 1.8-3.92) while laparoscopy (OR: 0.5, 95% CI: 0.38-0.69) and OAP combined with intravenous antibiotic prophylaxis (OR: 0.7, 95% CI: 0.51-0.97) were protective factors. In rectal surgery, independent risk factors for organ-space SSI were male sex (OR: 2.11, 95% CI: 1.34-3.31) and longer surgery (OR: 1.49, 95% CI: 1.03-2.15), whereas OAP with intravenous antibiotic prophylaxis (OR: 0.49, 95% CI: 0.32-0.73) was a protective factor. Among patients with organ-space SSI, we found a significant difference in the overall 30-day mortality, being higher in colon surgery than in rectal surgery (11.5% vs 5.1%, p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Organ-space SSI in colon and rectal surgery has some differences in terms of incidence, risk factors and outcomes. These differences could be considered for surveillance purposes and for the implementation of preventive strategies. Administration of OAP would be an important measure to reduce the OS-SSI rate in both colon and rectal surgeries.

10.
J Infect ; 74(6): 555-563, 2017 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28315721

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To determine current outcomes and predictors of treatment failure among patients with surgical site infection (SSI) after colorectal surgery. METHODS: A multicentre observational prospective cohort study of adults undergoing elective colorectal surgery in 10 Spanish hospitals (2011-2014). Treatment failure was defined as persistence of signs/symptoms of SSI or death at 30 days post-surgery. RESULTS: Of 3701 patients, 669 (18.1%) developed SSI; 336 (9.1%) were organ-space infections. Among patients with organ-space SSI, 81.2% required source control: 60.4% reoperation and 20.8% percutaneous/transrectal drainage. Overall treatment failure rate was 21.7%: 9% in incisional SSIs and 34.2% in organ-space SSIs (p < 0.001). Median length of stay was 15 days (IQR 9-22) for incisional SSIs and 24 days (IQR 17-35) for organ-space SSIs (p < 0.001). One hundred and twenty-seven patients (19%) required readmission and 35 patients died (5.2%). Risk factors for treatment failure among patients with organ-space SSI were age ≥65 years (OR 1.83, 95% CI: 1.07-1.83), laparoscopy (OR 1.7, 95% CI: 1.06-2.77), and reoperation (OR 2.8, 95% CI: 1.7-4.6). CONCLUSIONS: Rates of SSI and treatment failure in organ-space SSI after elective colorectal surgery are notably high. Careful attention should be paid to older patients with previous laparoscopy requiring reoperation for organ-space SSI, so that treatment failure can be identified early.


Asunto(s)
Cirugía Colorrectal/efectos adversos , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/tratamiento farmacológico , Insuficiencia del Tratamiento , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Estudios de Cohortes , Coinfección/tratamiento farmacológico , Cirugía Colorrectal/mortalidad , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana Múltiple , Femenino , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/complicaciones , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Laparoscopía , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Resultado del Tratamiento
11.
Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin ; 35(8): 505-510, 2017 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés, Español | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26790899

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Long-term care facilities (LTCFs) have become receptors of patients with a high risk of healthcare-associated infections (HAIs). OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of HAIs in LTCFs. METHOD: During the period 2011-2014 2 annual prevalence studies were performed according to Healthcare-associated infections in long-term-care facilities (HALT) study definitions and methodology. RESULTS: A total of 28,360 patients were included in the study. The overall prevalence rate of HAIs was 10.2%. Subacute units and palliative care units showed the highest rates, 22.3% and 18.7%, respectively. Main infections were respiratory tract infection (35.8%) and urinary tract infection (35.8%). CONCLUSION: These results were higher than other similar experiences, a fact that suggests the need to extend the specific strategies and programs to LTCFs, and ensuring a sufficient number of specialised staff in infection control.


Asunto(s)
Infección Hospitalaria/epidemiología , Cuidados a Largo Plazo , Instituciones Residenciales , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Vigilancia de la Población , Prevalencia , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio/epidemiología , Factores de Riesgo , España/epidemiología , Infecciones Urinarias/epidemiología
12.
Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther ; 14(1): 137-44, 2016.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26466197

RESUMEN

Objective To know the patterns and consumption trends (2008-2013) of antifungal agents for systemic use in 52 acute care hospitals affiliated to VINCat Program in Catalonia (Spain). Methods Consumption was calculated in defined daily doses (DDD)/100 patient-days and analyzed according to hospital size and complexity and clinical departments. Results Antifungal consumption was higher in intensive care units (ICU) (14.79) than in medical (3.08) and surgical departments (1.19). Fluconazole was the most consumed agent in all type of hospitals and departments. Overall antifungal consumption increased by 20.5%during the study period (p = 0.066); a significant upward trend was observed in the consumption of both azoles and echinocandins. In ICUs, antifungal consumption increased by 12.4% (p = 0.019). Conclusions The study showed a sustained increase in the overall consumption of systemic antifungals in a large number of acute care hospitals of different characteristics in Catalonia. In ICUs there was a trend towards the substitution of older agents by the new ones.


Asunto(s)
Anfotericina B/uso terapéutico , Antifúngicos/uso terapéutico , Azoles/uso terapéutico , Utilización de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Equinocandinas/uso terapéutico , Micosis/tratamiento farmacológico , Trasplante de Médula Ósea/efectos adversos , Hongos/efectos de los fármacos , Hongos/patogenicidad , Hongos/fisiología , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/estadística & datos numéricos , Micosis/etiología , Micosis/microbiología , Trasplante de Órganos/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , España , Servicio de Cirugía en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos
13.
Enferm. infecc. microbiol. clín. (Ed. impr.) ; 33(9): 625.e1-625.e23, nov. 2015. tab, graf
Artículo en Inglés | IBECS | ID: ibc-144640

RESUMEN

Both bacteremia and infective endocarditis caused by Staphylococcus aureus are common and severe diseases. The prognosis may darken not infrequently, especially in the presence of intracardiac devices or methicillin-resistance. Indeed, the optimization of the antimicrobial therapy is a key step in the outcome of these infections. The high rates of treatment failure and the increasing interest in the influence of vancomycin susceptibility in the outcome of infections caused by both methicillin-susceptible and - resistant isolates has led to the research of novel therapeutic schemes. Specifically, the interest raised in recent years on the new antimicrobials with activity against methicillin-resistant staphylococci has been also extended to infections caused by susceptible strains, which still carry the most important burden of infection. Recent clinical and experimental research has focused in the activity of new combinations of antimicrobials, their indication and role still being debatable. Also, the impact of an appropriate empirical antimicrobial treatment has acquired relevance in recent years. Finally, it is noteworthy the impact of the implementation of a systematic bundle of measures for improving the outcome. The aim of this clinical guideline is to provide an ensemble of recommendations in order to improve the treatment and prognosis of bacteremia and infective endocarditis caused by S. aureus, in accordance to the latest evidence published


Tanto la bacteriemia como la endocarditis infecciosa causada por Staphylococcus aureus son infecciones graves y frecuentes. El pronóstico puede verse ensombrecido por la presencia de dispositivos cardíacos o por la resistencia a meticilina. La optimización del tratamiento antimicrobiano es clave en los resultados. Las considerables tasas de fracaso terapéutico y la influencia de la susceptibilidad a vancomicina en el pronóstico, tanto de los episodios causados por cepas resistentes como sensibles a meticilina, ha conducido a la investigación de nuevos esquemas terapéuticos. Específicamente, el interés que en los últimos años han generado los nuevos antibióticos con actividad frente a cepas resistentes a meticilina se ha extendido a las cepas sensibles, que son aún responsables de la mayoría de los casos. Recientes estudios en el ámbito clínico y experimental se han centrado en la actividad de nuevas combinaciones, cuyo papel e indicación clínicas son aún objeto de debate. Por otro lado, la importancia de un tratamiento antibiótico empírico precoz y adecuado ha cobrado interés en los últimos años. Finalmente, cabe destacar el impacto que la instauración de un conjunto sistemático de medidas en el manejo de la bacteriemia estafilocócica tiene en el pronóstico global de la infección. Esta guía clínica reúne un conjunto de recomendaciones a la luz de la última evidencia científica, con el objeto de mejorar el tratamiento y pronóstico de la bacteriemia y endocarditis infecciosa causada por S. Aureus


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Bacteriemia/tratamiento farmacológico , Endocarditis Bacteriana/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Bacteriemia/diagnóstico , Endocarditis Bacteriana/diagnóstico , Staphylococcus aureus/patogenicidad , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina/patogenicidad
14.
Enferm. infecc. microbiol. clín. (Ed. impr.) ; 33(9): 626-632, nov. 2015. tab
Artículo en Inglés | IBECS | ID: ibc-144641

RESUMEN

Bacteremia and infective endocarditis caused by Staphylococcus aureus are common and severe diseases. Optimization of treatment is fundamental in the prognosis of these infections. The high rates of treatment failure and the increasing interest in the influence of vancomycin susceptibility in the outcome of infections caused by both methicillin-susceptible and -resistant isolates have led to research on novel therapeutic schemes. The interest in the new antimicrobials with activity against methicillin-resistant staphylococci has been extended to susceptible strains, which still carry the most important burden of infection. New combinations of antimicrobials have been investigated in experimental and clinical studies, but their role is still being debated. Also, the appropriateness of the initial empirical therapy has acquired relevance in recent years. The aim of this guideline is to update the 2009 guidelines and to provide an ensemble of recommendations in order to improve the treatment of staphylococcal bacteremia and infective endocarditis, in accordance with the latest published evidence


La bacteriemia y la endocarditis infecciosa causadas por Staphylococcus aureus son enfermedades frecuentes y graves. El tratamiento antibiótico es clave en el éxito terapéutico. El reciente descubrimiento de la relación entre la susceptibilidad a vancomicina y el pronóstico de estas infecciones, tanto cuando en cepas resistentes como sensibles a meticilina, ha llevado a la investigación de nuevos tratamientos. El interés por los nuevos antibióticos con actividad frente a cepas resistentes a meticilina se ha extendido a las cepas sensibles, aún responsables de la mayor parte de infecciones. Estudios clínicos y experimentales han evaluado la eficacia de nuevas combinaciones de antimicrobianos, si bien su indicación no ha sido aún establecida. También la necesidad de un tratamiento inicial empírico correcto ha cobrado relevancia. El objetivo de este documento es actualizar el documento de consenso del 2009 y obtener un conjunto de recomendaciones para mejorar el tratamiento de la bacteriemia y endocarditis estafilocócicas, de acuerdo a la última evidencia científica publicada


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Bacteriemia/tratamiento farmacológico , Endocarditis Bacteriana/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Bacteriemia/diagnóstico , Endocarditis Bacteriana/diagnóstico , Staphylococcus aureus/patogenicidad , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina/patogenicidad
15.
Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin ; 33(9): 625.e1-625.e23, 2015 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25937457

RESUMEN

Both bacteremia and infective endocarditis caused by Staphylococcus aureus are common and severe diseases. The prognosis may darken not infrequently, especially in the presence of intracardiac devices or methicillin-resistance. Indeed, the optimization of the antimicrobial therapy is a key step in the outcome of these infections. The high rates of treatment failure and the increasing interest in the influence of vancomycin susceptibility in the outcome of infections caused by both methicillin-susceptible and -resistant isolates has led to the research of novel therapeutic schemes. Specifically, the interest raised in recent years on the new antimicrobials with activity against methicillin-resistant staphylococci has been also extended to infections caused by susceptible strains, which still carry the most important burden of infection. Recent clinical and experimental research has focused in the activity of new combinations of antimicrobials, their indication and role still being debatable. Also, the impact of an appropriate empirical antimicrobial treatment has acquired relevance in recent years. Finally, it is noteworthy the impact of the implementation of a systematic bundle of measures for improving the outcome. The aim of this clinical guideline is to provide an ensemble of recommendations in order to improve the treatment and prognosis of bacteremia and infective endocarditis caused by S. aureus, in accordance to the latest evidence published.


Asunto(s)
Bacteriemia/diagnóstico , Bacteriemia/tratamiento farmacológico , Endocarditis Bacteriana/diagnóstico , Endocarditis Bacteriana/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/diagnóstico , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Bacteriemia/microbiología , Infección Hospitalaria/diagnóstico , Infección Hospitalaria/tratamiento farmacológico , Infección Hospitalaria/microbiología , Manejo de la Enfermedad , Endocarditis Bacteriana/microbiología , Endocarditis Bacteriana/cirugía , Humanos , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina/efectos de los fármacos , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina/aislamiento & purificación , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa , Vigilancia de la Población , Espectrometría de Masa por Láser de Matriz Asistida de Ionización Desorción , Nivel de Atención , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/diagnóstico por imagen
16.
Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin ; 33(9): 626-32, 2015 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25937456

RESUMEN

Bacteremia and infective endocarditis caused by Staphylococcus aureus are common and severe diseases. Optimization of treatment is fundamental in the prognosis of these infections. The high rates of treatment failure and the increasing interest in the influence of vancomycin susceptibility in the outcome of infections caused by both methicillin-susceptible and -resistant isolates have led to research on novel therapeutic schemes. The interest in the new antimicrobials with activity against methicillin-resistant staphylococci has been extended to susceptible strains, which still carry the most important burden of infection. New combinations of antimicrobials have been investigated in experimental and clinical studies, but their role is still being debated. Also, the appropriateness of the initial empirical therapy has acquired relevance in recent years. The aim of this guideline is to update the 2009 guidelines and to provide an ensemble of recommendations in order to improve the treatment of staphylococcal bacteremia and infective endocarditis, in accordance with the latest published evidence.


Asunto(s)
Bacteriemia/diagnóstico , Bacteriemia/tratamiento farmacológico , Endocarditis Bacteriana/diagnóstico , Endocarditis Bacteriana/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/diagnóstico , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Bacteriemia/microbiología , Infección Hospitalaria/diagnóstico , Infección Hospitalaria/tratamiento farmacológico , Infección Hospitalaria/microbiología , Manejo de la Enfermedad , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana Múltiple , Endocarditis Bacteriana/microbiología , Endocarditis Bacteriana/cirugía , Humanos , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina/efectos de los fármacos , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina/aislamiento & purificación , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa , Vigilancia de la Población , Espectrometría de Masa por Láser de Matriz Asistida de Ionización Desorción , Nivel de Atención , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/diagnóstico por imagen
17.
J Antimicrob Chemother ; 70(4): 1193-7, 2015 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25433010

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To analyse the possible relationship between consumption of old and new MRSA-active antibiotics and burden of MRSA in acute care hospitals in Catalonia during the period 2007-12. METHODS: Fifty-four hospitals participating in the VINCat Programme were included. Proportion of MRSA (resistant isolates of Staphylococcus aureus per 100 isolates of S. aureus tested), incidence of new cases of infection [new cases of MRSA per 1000 occupied bed-days (OBD)] and incidence of cases of bacteraemia (MRSA bacteraemia cases per 1000 OBD) were determined to estimate the annual MRSA burden. Antibiotic consumption was calculated in DDD/100 OBD. Cost was expressed in euros/100 OBD. RESULTS: MRSA rates remained stable over the study period, with the proportion of MRSA ranging from 20% to 22.82% in 2007 and 2012, respectively (P=0.864). Consumption of old MRSA-active antibiotics (vancomycin and teicoplanin) did not change significantly, with values from 1.51 to 2.07 DDD/100 OBD (P=0.693). Consumption of new MRSA-active antibiotics (linezolid and daptomycin) increased significantly, with values rising from 0.24 to 1.49 DDD/100 OBD (P<0.001). Cost increased by almost 200%. CONCLUSIONS: A widespread and steady increase in consumption of new MRSA-active antibiotics was observed among acute care hospitals in Catalonia, in spite of a stable MRSA burden. At the same time, consumption of old drugs remained stable. Such trends resulted in a significant increase in cost. Our findings suggest that factors other than the proportion of methicillin resistance among S. aureus may influence the use of old and new MRSA-active antibiotics in the clinical setting.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Utilización de Medicamentos , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina/aislamiento & purificación , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/epidemiología , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/microbiología , Bacteriemia/epidemiología , Bacteriemia/microbiología , Hospitales , Humanos , Incidencia , Prevalencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , España/epidemiología
18.
Enferm. infecc. microbiol. clín. (Ed. impr.) ; 32(10): 654-661, dic. 2014. ilus, tab
Artículo en Español | IBECS | ID: ibc-130109

RESUMEN

IINTRODUCCIÓN: Los programas de control de uso de antibióticos suelen incluir intervenciones basadas en recomendaciones no impositivas a los prescriptores. Interesa conocer los factores relacionados con la adherencia a las recomendaciones y su funcionamiento en la práctica real. MÉTODOS: Estudio multicéntrico, controlado y aleatorizado, realizado en 32 unidades de hospitalización. Especialistas en enfermedades infecciosas revisaron, alrededor del tercer día, las prescripciones de antibióticos, estableciendo recomendaciones. Describimos la implantación de la intervención, analizamos los factores asociados al seguimiento de las recomendaciones y el impacto de la intervención. RESULTADOS: Se realizaron 3.192 intervenciones. Las fuentes de información empleadas para la elaboración de las recomendaciones variaron significativamente entre los centros. En el 65% se recomendó alguna modificación del tratamiento: suspender los antibióticos (47%), modificar la vía de administración (26%), cambiar o variar el número de antibióticos (27%) y cambiar la dosis (5%). En el 75% se recomendó simplificar el tratamiento. La adherencia fue del 68%, con variaciones significativas entre los centros, y fue mayor cuando se recomendó ajuste de dosis o cambio de vía, durante el primer periodo del estudio y cuando las recomendaciones se realizaban, además de por escrito, verbalmente. No se pudo constatar impacto en el consumo de antibióticos ni en la incidencia de patógenos resistentes. CONCLUSIONES: Una elevada proporción de tratamientos antibióticos son susceptibles de modificación, generalmente hacia la simplificación. La adherencia a las recomendaciones fue elevada, aunque variable, dependiendo del centro, del tipo de recomendación, del periodo del estudio y de que la recomendación se realizara mediante un comentario verbal además de escrito


INTRODUCTION: Stewardship programs on the use of antibiotics usually include interventions based on non-compulsory recommendations for the prescribers. Factors related to the adherence to expert recommendations, and the implementation of these programmes in daily practice, are of interest. METHODS: A randomized, controlled, multicentre intervention study was performed in 32 hospitalization units. Antibiotic prescriptions were evaluated by an infectious disease specialist on the third day. We describe the implementation of the intervention, the factors associated with adherence to recommendations, and the impact of the intervention. RESULTS: A total of 3,192 interventions were carried out. Information sources used to prepare the recommendations varied significantly between centres. A modification was recommended in 65% of cases: withdrawal (47%), change in administration route (26%), change of drugs or number of antibiotics (27%), and change in dose (5%). Simplification of treatment accounted for 75% of all recommendations. Adherence was 68%, with significant differences between hospitals, and higher when the recommendations consisted of a dose adjustment or change of route, during the first intervention period, and also when recommendations were personally commented on, in addition to writing a note in the clinical chart. We did not find any reduction in antibiotic consumption or variation in the incidence of resistant pathogens. CONCLUSIONS: An important proportion of antibiotic prescriptions may be susceptible to improvement, most of them towards simplification. The adherence to the intervention was high, but significant variations at different centres were observed, depending on the type of recommendation, and the study period. Those recommendations that were personally commented on were more followed more than those only written


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Antiinfecciosos/metabolismo , Antiinfecciosos/uso terapéutico , Cumplimiento de la Medicación/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitalización/tendencias , Antiinfecciosos/farmacología , Antiinfecciosos/normas , Modelos Logísticos , Indicadores de Impacto Social , Evaluación del Impacto en la Salud/métodos
19.
Med Clin (Barc) ; 143 Suppl 1: 43-7, 2014 Jul.
Artículo en Español | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25128359

RESUMEN

The main objective of this study was to validate the structure of the infection control team (ICT) in the hospitals adhered to VINCat program and secondary objective was to establish the consistency of resources of each center with the requirements established by the program. Qualitative research consisting of an ethnographic study using participant observation during the years 2008-2010. The centers were stratified in three groups by complexity and beds. The instrument was a semistructured interview to members of the ICT. The transcription of the interview was sent to informants for validation. In November 2010 a questionnaire regarding human resources and number hours dedicated to the ICT was sent. During 2008-2010, 65 centers had been adhered to VINCat program. In 2010, the ICT of Group I hospitals had a mean of two physician, one in full-time and one nurse for every 230 beds. In Group II, one physician part-time and one nurse per 180 beds and in Group III a physician and a nurse for every 98 beds, both part-time. In 2010, all hospitals had a structured ICT, an operative infection committee, and a hospital member representing the center at the program as well as enough electronic resources. The hospitals participating in the program have now VINCat an adequate surveillance structure and meet the minimum technical and human resources required to provide high-quality data. However human resources are not guaranteed.


Asunto(s)
Infección Hospitalaria/prevención & control , Control de Infecciones/organización & administración , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/epidemiología , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/prevención & control , Clostridioides difficile , Infecciones por Clostridium/epidemiología , Infecciones por Clostridium/microbiología , Infecciones por Clostridium/prevención & control , Infección Hospitalaria/epidemiología , Infección Hospitalaria/microbiología , Utilización de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Recursos en Salud , Capacidad de Camas en Hospitales , Departamentos de Hospitales , Hospitales/clasificación , Humanos , Control de Infecciones/estadística & datos numéricos , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina , Personal de Hospital/provisión & distribución , Vigilancia de la Población , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Estudios Retrospectivos , España/epidemiología , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/epidemiología , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/microbiología , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/prevención & control , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/epidemiología , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/prevención & control
20.
Med. clín (Ed. impr.) ; 143(supl.1): 43-47, jul. 2014. tab
Artículo en Español | IBECS | ID: ibc-141232

RESUMEN

Este estudio tiene como objetivo principal validar la estructura de los equipos de control de infección (ECI) adheridos al Programa VINCat y como objetivo secundario establecer la concordancia de los recursos de cada centro con los requerimientos establecidos. Investigación cualitativa consistente en un estudio etnográfico mediante observación participante durante los años 2008 a 2010. Los centros se estratificaron en 3 grupos según complejidad y camas. El instrumento de trabajo fue una entrevista semiestructurada grupal. La entrevista transcrita se envió a los informantes para su validación. En noviembre de 2010 se envió un cuestionario sobre la dotación y el número de horas de dedicación de los ECI. Durante 2008-2010 participaron en el programa 65 centros. En el año 2010, los ECI del grupo I disponían de una media de 2 médicos, uno con dedicación completa, y de 1 enfermera por cada 230 camas; en el grupo II, de 1 médico a tiempo parcial y de 1 enfermera por cada 180 camas, y en el grupo III de 1 médico y de 1 enfermera por cada 98 camas, ambos a tiempo parcial. En 2010, todos los centros poseían ECI estructurado, comisión de infecciones operativa, representante del centro en el programa y recursos informáticos suficientes. Los hospitales participantes en el Programa VINCat disponen en la actualidad de una estructura de vigilancia adecuada y reúnen los recursos humanos y técnicos mínimos requeridos para proporcionar datos de alta calidad; sin embargo, los recursos humanos de los ECI no están adecuadamente consolidados (AU)


The main objective of this study was to validate the structure of the infection control team (ICT) in the hospitals adhered to VINCat program and secondary objective was to establish the consistency of resources of each center with the requirements established by the program. Qualitative research consisting of an ethnographic study using participant observation during the years 2008-2010. The centers were stratified in three groups by complexity and beds. The instrument was a semistructured interview to members of the ICT. The transcription of the interview was sent to informants for validation. In November 2010 a questionnaire regarding human resources and number hours dedicated to the ICT was sent. During 2008-2010, 65 centers had been adhered to VINCat program. In 2010, the ICT of Group I hospitals had a mean of two physician, one in full-time and one nurse for every 230 beds. In Group II, one physician part-time and one nurse per 180 beds and in Group III a physician and a nurse for every 98 beds, both part-time. In 2010, all hospitals had a structured ICT, an operative infection committee, and a hospital member representing the center at the program as well as enough electronic resources. The hospitals participating in the program have now VINCat an adequate surveillance structure and meet the minimum technical and human resources required to provide high-quality data. However human resources are not guaranteed (AU)


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Control de Infecciones/organización & administración , Control de Infecciones/estadística & datos numéricos , Infección Hospitalaria/epidemiología , Infección Hospitalaria/microbiología , Infección Hospitalaria/prevención & control , Utilización de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitales/clasificación , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina , Personal de Hospital/provisión & distribución , Vigilancia de la Población , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/epidemiología , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/prevención & control , Infecciones por Clostridium/epidemiología , Infecciones por Clostridium/microbiología , Infecciones por Clostridium/prevención & control , Clostridioides difficile , Recursos en Salud , Capacidad de Camas en Hospitales , Departamentos de Hospitales , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Estudios Retrospectivos , España/epidemiología , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/epidemiología , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/microbiología , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/prevención & control , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/epidemiología , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/prevención & control
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...